Conventions

Home

M J Bridge

Bidding

Hands

Theory

Beginner and above

Context  -  Acol bidding - opening at the two-level - combining the bids.

One strong bid


A basic version of this method has already been considered under standard methods.


On that page a game-forcing bid of 2 based on twenty three or more points was teamed up with single-suited weak twos in the other three suits.


The game-forcing strong bid as defined above is a very occasional performer.

Better is to extend the range of hands which qualify for this bid as discussed under ‘game-forcing openings’.


Alternatively replace it with my ‘almost game-forcing’ bid.  In effect this bid covers all game-going hands ,and also invitational single-suited hands.  Invitational hands with 5-4 shape will have to follow a slower route, but that is not nearly such a loss as you might at first think.  (Note that those of you who are used to something like Benji will be used to opening many hands with a Benji bid which really do not need to be opened with a forcing bid.)


With either of these adaptation this system becomes my recommended method from beginner to a good intermediate standard.


Variations


Variations in the detail of the other bids is possible.


The weak two openings


may be varied by partnership agreement.

Some will play a different range or suit-quality requirement.

Others will stretch their requirements according to the vulnerabilities and their position at the table.


Such matters are discussed on the pages ‘single-suited weak twos’.


2NT


The exact range for your opening bid of 2NT is also a matter for partnership choice.


Each of ‘19-20’, ‘20-21’ and ‘21-22’ has its following.


The modified range may have to be accompanied by a revised way of showing other ranges.

There is a fuller discussion on the page ‘opening a strong 2NT’.


System changes


Even within the context of ‘one strong bid’ further choices of method are still possible.


The system as outlined above includes the relatively ineffective weak 2, although this is the case in the vast majority of standard systems.


If you want to try something just a little different then try replacing it with a 2 version of ‘Flannery’ or an ‘assumed fit weak 2’.

This page last revised 9th Jul 2019